Sunday, July 31, 2005

Only the Good Die Young



"You might have heard I run with a dangerous crowd... We ain't too pretty we ain't too proud..." Senator Robert C. "Clorox" Byrd (D- Burning Cross, West Virginia), at 87 the oldest and whitest member of the U.S. Congress, this week won passage of a bill that would provide $10 million toward a memorial to slain civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King. "So what?" you ask. King was a good enough guy, the feds take our money for stuff like that all the time and everyone knows Byrd produces more pricey pork every year than Jimmy Dean. So, really, $10 million is chump change in the grand scheme of things. The better question to ask is, "Are you kidding me?" Aided by a complicit press, Byrd has spent a public lifetime covering up his private one as a "Kleagle" (paid recruiter) and "Exalted Cyclops" (Keeper of the Silver Zippo and the Gas-Soaked Kross in the Garage) for his Ku Klux Klan chapter back home. He admits to joining the Klan in 1941 "for about a year" because it was a good way to fight communism. Byrd says he left because he lost interest in the organization, he wasn't crazy about the pointed hats and he kept forgetting the secret handshake. But a paper trail and years of bloviating bigotry on the public record (if not in The Washington Post) belie his cover. Over a so-far-47-year self-serving Senate career, Byrd has defended the Klan against blame for its part in generations of racial violence across the South. While many were marching in Selma, Byrd did his part for freedom with a 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. And he has demonstrated his discrimination is indiscriminate by making bad history as the single senator opposing the nominations of both the liberal Thurgood Marshall AND the conservative Clarence Thomas... the only two black Justices ever to ride the big bench. So why, after all these years, is this hateful old gasbag now wrapping his arms around the memory of Martin? Is Byrd simply an old bigot making amends for a rotten record before he meets his maker? Or is he filling his Depends with worry that the voters of West Virginia are finally ready to swap him out for a senator they can respect? We may never know. We do know that the King family has yet to comment on this week's news. Maybe it's because a Robert Byrd-sponsored MLK monument makes about as much sense as a Yasser Arafat Synagogue.... "They say there's a heaven for those who will wait... Some say it's better but I say it ain't..." Especially if it means an eternity listening to the prattling and preaching of Jimmy Carter. The historically least of our presidents was dispatched overwhelmingly by voters after one ruinous term that ended in 1980. Under his lack-of-leadership, the country experienced double digit inflation, double digit unemployment, double digit interest rates and the disrespect of friends and foes around the world. Jimmy himself invented something called "The Misery Index" so we could all measure the suffering of the country on his watch. We the people always hoped and assumed he would head back to rural Georgia after losing to Ronald Reagan, humbled-but-wiser for his failure, and perhaps quietly fill his remaining days doing something that wouldn't hurt him or us. But as president, Jimmy Carter embraced dictators, made bad decisions and advanced anti-American interests whenever he could. Those are the things he always did best. And even today, this 81-year-old crank gets pain-in-the-ass-pity-press whenever he takes his everything-everywhere-is-holier-than-anything-in-America show on the road. Like the other day in Birmingham, England when the former president did the wrong thing once more in criticizing an ongoing war effort while standing on foreign soil. He whined about the wisdom of the Iraq war and said that it gives terrorists an excuse to attack the United States. Among his uninformed observations was this whopper: "What has happened at Guantanamo Bay... does not represent the will of the American people" and "the camp is an embarrassment." Wrong once again, Jimbo. According to a June 25 Rasmussen Report survey, only 20% of Americans (mostly members of the ACLU, some traitors in Congress and the reporters at Newsweak) believe prisoners at Gitmo have been treated unfairly. Seven-out-of-ten adults believe the prisoners are being treated "better than they deserve" (36%) or "about right" (34%). The Rasmussen Report did not ask respondents if Jimmy Carter embarrassed them. However, 58% of those surveyed think the former president is brain-damaged because he has been "using his forehead to pound nails into wood" (37%) or because he "fell off a ladder onto his head" (21%) while building houses for the needy. 12% of those surveyed said, "Jimmy who?"....

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

A national holiday, numerous highways, monuments galore...hmmmm, one more memorial can't hurt, can it? As far as the remarks concerning Carter, I can only say that "Jimmy cracked corn" (peanuts) and I don't care.

9:23 PM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Dear anon,

The MLK monument was originally meant to be privately-funded... until Sheets stepped in and offered up your money. The $10 million will be about 20% of the estimated cost.

The MLK holiday was signed into law by President Reagan. Believe it or not, Jimmy Carter was so incompetent, he couldn't even get that done with a 'rat House and a 'rat Senate.

And finally, an early settler named Vernon Main has more streets named after him than any other person in history. In second place is the inventor of pancake syrup, Mary Maple.

10:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If only Ada Kirby (Byrd's mom) and Lillian Carter had had the right to abort...

4:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is ancient history.

What about today's mess.

What about Carl Rove?

What about the "Shrub" running to his "Hollywood" (built just for the show and a cerebral connection to R. Reagan) Texas ranch for 5 weeks at the same time as 20 Marines from Ohio die in his war in Iraq?

When compared to what's going on, I really don't care about $10 million for a memorial for a man of peace even if it is sponsored by a grand wizard from
W. Va..

9:47 AM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Dear anonymous,

A. Quit beating the dead horse about Karl Rove. If you want to get rid of him, build a party with some ideas and he'll be gone. Your pathetic wishful carping only makes you look the fool.

B. I like the idea of a President who gets out of Washington and chops wood on a working vacation. Get over the ranch-thing. Bush is a rich Texan. Rich Texan's own ranches. Something tells me you didn't complain about the last President when he would sponge stints at the luxury vacation homes of his rich donors. Actually, the Crawford ranch looks like a pretty nice place to me. I'd run the country from there and spend five weeks a year in Washington.

C. The brave Marines we lost didn't die because the President went to his ranch. You should be more concerned with substance than symbolism.

D. I don't know that I would be glad to "share the sheets" with Bob Byrd... but hey, you democrats have your own standards.

6:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

stevesamerica, you are presenting guantanamo like a poor mans bill oreilly. How about some real constructive thoughts instead of jibber jabber about the ACLU. But that's not my point. I would say I support Guantanamo, like you, but I wouldnt be willing to go around parading my opinions. I'd be willing to bet you havent done any fighting on the frontlines in your lifetime (neither have I in my many years), but correspondingly, you havent done any time as a POW either. If John McCain is raising concerns about Guantanamo and telling you that he wouldn't wish torture upon any of his enemies, we need to shut up and listen. You are sitting in your fat love seat typing while he cant lift his arms over his chest. He's experienced it, youv'e watched bad movies. Now yes, McCain's torture was not the equivalent of Guantanamo, so I'm not arguing that Guantanamo is inherently bad. I will say, however, that it seems that whenever people do want to make sure that it doesn't become another Abu, its always the people who have never experienced war who are so oppossed to protecting even the most basic human rights (or people who were busy guarding some shit town in the South because of his fathers connections). It's good that the ACLU raises concerns about Guantanamo, because we know they won't get their way (shut the whole thing down), but we also know they are probably doing something to make sure it doesn't become another Abu

7:32 PM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Dear Anonymous,

Where to begin?

A. Bill O'Reilly is a putz. He's irrelevant in this conversation.

B. So are John McCain and the socialists at the ACLU, because Gitmo is a resort. There's no torture or mistreatment going on there.

C. I don't have a love seat for typing or any other purpose.

D. It sounds like you are saying the ACLU is right to raise holy hell about Gitmo just so the powers-that-be don't even think about putting panties on the heads of terrorists. Have I got that right?

7:59 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home