Saturday, July 02, 2005

Advice and Consent


Ted Kennedy weighs in this week with some unsolicited advice for the President as the country awaits the pick that will replace the retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: "The-uh-President had-uh bettah float his nominee past the-uh minority pahty... the-uh Democrahts, and not just drive... I-uh, I mean dive... in to the-uh shallow but tricky waters of the cahnfirmation process with a uh-conservative young waitress, for exahmple, who very well might-uh be unacceptable and-uh find herself trahpped in the flooded Oldsmobile of senate gridlock while the uh-President is-uh forced to swim away to save himself. Has-uh anybody seen... where is my-uh drink?" With his usual eloquence, the most corpulent Kennedy has thrown down the gauntlet like it was three fingers of scotch.... From Sots to Sows. While Uncle Ted headed to happy hour in Hyannisport, 800 nags from NOW were gettin' nasty at their annual meeting in Nashville. The news of an imminent Bush nominee had the ugly-mean-or-otherwise-unpopular-girls-from-your-high-school snorting and stomping their hooves in pre-emptive disapproval of any SCOTUS-nominee they deem politically to the right of Rosie O'Donnell.... WARNING: The following question is graphic. What strange phenomena has a band of female-like gender-champions sharing a bed with Ted Kennedy? After all, the guy's a killer of at least one woman and a serial abuser of many more. But what's a little misogyny among friends? They all have common cause and a greater purpose. Abortion. It's all about abortion, all the time. While many reasonable people view "Roe v. Wade" as the ultimate example of judges legislating from the bench, over-reaching and enabling infanticide, other reasonable people make a case for the privacy, health and personal freedom of the mother. Regardless of your stance on the most divisive issue in America, this much is clear: Abortion... free, frequent, at any age, anyplace and in-your-face... has become the glue that binds the Democrats' Felini-cast of a coalition. Abortion has become the 'rats litmus test for all people in power, especially Supreme Court judges. Not competence, ideas, integrity or intellectual honesty. Abortion. And it's the single-biggest reason their lights are dimming. Because at the end of the day, if your party has no higher purpose than to protect an indecisive someone's "right" to drive a spike into a baby's skull when he's old enough to grab a pacifier, your party is over.... Some Advice for the Right. Abortion was around before Roe v. Wade and repeal ain't going to make it go away. It will only make it more dangerous. The best we can all hope for is to make it a small, sad-but-safe business.... Some advice for both ends. We don't want a Court to make stupid laws, drive political or moral agendas or grow the role of the government. That's the work of the arrogant pinheads "we the people" send to Washington. We want a Court full of people smart enough to read the Constitution, understand the words as written and keep the pinheads from taking our stuff and running our lives.

8 Comments:

Blogger sherle said...

O MY GOSH!!! Where did you ever find that? You made my day Steve! God Bless America!

9:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps some of us think that one's stance on abortion reveals their "competence, ideas, integrity or intellectual honesty." Every generation has an issue that truly can serve as a barometer of one's morality and "fitness to serve". At one time, it was slavery. At another it was the woman's right to vote. Then Civil Rights. Now, your generation has to deal with how your political leaders stand on a woman's right to protect herself and put her life before that of a fetus. Or, a "fetus'" right to life, depending on how you look at it. Steve, do you celebrate your birthday on the day your parents conceived you or the day you came out of your mother's womb? It is a much more complicated issue than "whether or not the supreme court justice is for slamming a spike through a child's skull." It is an issue that is heavy enough to deserve the attention it gets from both sides, seeing as it is a debate for both sides that means the difference (literally) between life and death. It is an issue that reveals the nominee's stance on women, an individual's rights, privacy, sex education, church and state, health care, poverty, and the welfare state. This one issue runs the gamut of ideas and philosophies and challenges every citizen to check his or her own conscience and evaluate his or her own empathy. I think this is an issue that can expose a nominee's prejudice, short-sightedness and lust for power and control like no other issue on the table today. What more could one ask from a litmus test designed to evaluate our "least political" branch? You dismiss the abortion debate too easily and lump all pro-choice supporters as duped feminazi Kennedy allies. There are pro-choice people in both camps, and some (like myself) despise the senator just as much as you. What do I despise more? Paying for unwanted children with my tax dollars because the mothers never learned sex education due to "abstinence only" programs because republicans won't allow schools to get any money without this fail-proof sex-ed program... I despise the crime rate and poverty linked to illegitemacy and welfare moms... I despise the vulchers that make money off of illegal and unsafe abortions because women don't want their parents or partners to know... I despise the freaks that bomb abortion clinics in the name of "life" just as psychotically and paradoxically as the hijackers took down the World Trade Center in the name of "Allah"... So yes, Steve, on this issue I align myself with the fat, drunken slob of a senator on this one issue. And no, I was not an "ugly girl in high school" or however you so charmingly portrayed pro-choice females.

10:09 AM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Right, wrong, life, death and personal responsibility are not generational issues. Ted Kennedy uses women like Kleenex. Late-term abortion is indefensible. And some of my fondest memories of childhood are from the days when I was "in utero." But then, I was somewhat precocious.

Like I said, abortion is a tough issue. But pegging the agendas on the left is a piece of cake.

1:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Thank God for Rick Santorum, a Right wing Republican who represents the broad issue of the Repulsive...I mean Republican party. Just because the thinly veiled representatives of the Religous right people say it louder than the left does not automatically mean the right is right.

Being an American, even a Steve American means you have rights that extend beyond those that the most powerful religion in the country wish to extend to you. It's simple, you don't want to have an abortion, DON'T! The law doesn't dictate that you have to. It is about personal freedom , infringing on that is the single item agenda of the right wing facist government that panders almost exclusively to those who are just like those in power. Pegging THAT agenda on the right was a piece of tastier cake than the one you mentioned.

3:24 PM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Mr. Guapo,

Abortion is not about personal freedom. Abortion is all about the answer to the question, "When does life begin?"

I think we can all agree that life begins sometime after right-before-conception. And I think most people will agree that, at some point after conception, the child has the same right to life as his former-fetus-mother.

So, unless you believe in a parent's right to kill a child for skateboarding into the side of the family's new Lexus, tell me: when do YOU think the clock starts on that child's individual right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?"

1:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

when it is able to live if taken out of the womb.

2:26 PM  
Blogger Steve's America said...

Not so simple, anonymous.

By your logic, the answer would be to deliver the baby at any point after conception and roll the dice on whether or not the he or she will live and in what kind of condition.

5:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well in a country where assisted suicide is verboten, I am not sure that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is even applicable if as a sane, ill adult you can't choose to end your own life. Let's face it, the issue of what IS life is what you are asking. Was Terri Schaivo living a life? As far as my own beliefs of when a life begins are unimportant since I have never fathered a child, nor been impregnated, this is not an issue for me, it is an individual issue for the two parents, not a bunch of religous zealots who would say that contraception is a form of abortion.

7:21 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home